System for production control, quality and workforce planning — run from one place.
Built inside real automotive production and quality work, for the companies who run their plant on Excel and paper because everything else is priced for someone bigger.
The real competition isn't Siemens. It's a spreadsheet.
Enterprise quality suites are built and priced for OEMs. Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers — the companies that actually run the automotive supply chain — are left with what a spreadsheet can hold.
Control plans printed and taped to the machine.
The skills matrix lives with one person — who is on holiday.
Enterprise suites, priced and staffed for OEMs — not a 60-person plant.
Nineteen modules. Four jobs.
Everything a plant needs to run its daily quality routine, the IATF core tools, and the people who do the work — in one schema, not a folder of spreadsheets.
Product → operation → characteristic hierarchy, tolerances flow live into the shop floor.
AIAG-VDA aligned, hung off real control-plan operations rather than duplicated.
I-MR charts, Cp/Cpk, Pp/Ppk, histogram. Solid basics — deeper study in plan.
Gauge register, due-date tracking, a QR code that resolves to the record.
The daily quality & safety huddle, digitised — one click into a PDCA case.
Kanban across Plan/Do/Check/Act, 5-Why, Ishikawa with weighted team voting.
Request → queue → measuring → done, timed, with deviation capture.
Operator, supervisor and manager tiers off one shared question bank.
Per-line production, scrap Pareto, downtime, plan vs. actual, YTD.
Who is allowed to run what, and what they need before they can.
Not automotive-specific. Rosters, coverage, drag-and-drop reassignment.
Also not automotive-specific. Pay tied to where someone actually stood.
Who is trained, on what, and what is about to expire.
Seven PDF generators and one consolidated master report.
New-line launch: stations, takt study, readiness gate, approval.
One corporate view across plants, without merging their data.
A safety data sheet becomes a one-page card, reviewed before publish.
Four competence-based roles, row-level security in the database itself.
Czech, English and German, throughout — every screen, not a landing page.
Everything is linked, by construction.
Suites achieve this through integration projects between vendors, sold separately. Here, it's one schema — a tolerance, an incident, or a finding only ever needs to be entered once.
Built by someone who lived it.
Years spent inside real automotive production and quality roles — not requirements gathered secondhand. Every module reflects a workflow that was run by hand, on a real shop floor, before it was ever written as code.
Four tiers. No tier solves the whole thing at a price a mid-sized supplier will pay.
The core tools of Tier 1, the daily shop-floor rhythm of Tier 2, audit and SPC depth reaching toward Tier 3 — combined, at a Tier 4 price.
| Capability | Prodnexa | Enterprise Suite | Connected Worker | Specialist Tools | Excel / Paper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control plan management | Full | Full | None | Full | Manual |
| PFMEA (AIAG-VDA, AP) | Full | Full | None | Full | Manual |
| SPC charts & Cp/Cpk | Solid basicsIn progress | Full | Basic | Best in class | Manual |
| MSA / Gauge R&R study | Record onlyIn progress | Full | None | Best in class | Template |
| Daily stand-up / andon | Full | Partial | Best in class | None | Whiteboard |
| Shift roster & performance pay | Full | Separate HR | None | None | Manual |
| Multi-plant rollup | Full | Full | Partial | None | None |
| Mobile app / offline | NoneIn progress | Full | Best in class | Partial | None |
| Deployment time | Days | 9–18 months | Weeks | Weeks–months | Immediate |
| Indicative annual cost, 30 users | €4,680–10,680/yr | $100k–800k/yr | $10k–90k/yr | $18k–90k/yr | $0/yr + chaos |
Wider than automotive.
Shift planning, vacation planning and performance-based pay carry zero automotive-specific logic. Retail, healthcare, logistics and hospitality all run shifts.
A cost structure they can't match.
Their cost stack
- Data-centre contracts
- Sales teams and implementation consultants
- 9–18 month deployments, billed by the hour
- Years of legacy architecture — hard to restructure now
Our cost stack
- Pay-as-you-go cloud hosting, scales on demand
- AI-leveraged, small and effective team
- Days from request to production
- A fresh, flexible system — built to adapt to your needs
Pricing, in three pieces.
Illustrative for now — the real numbers get set with the first design-partner plants. Flat, per plant, not per seat: the friction every per-user competitor charges for.
- Control Plan, PFMEA, SPC
- Audits, PDCA/8D, calibration
- Chemical safety, certifications
- Everything in Core Quality
- Stand-up boards, measurement lab
- Reporting, multi-plant rollup
- Shift & vacation planning
- Performance-based pay
- No automotive dependency
A 30-user plant on Intelex Essentials alone (its cheapest published tier — Advanced and Enterprise cost more): from $1,470/month. The Full Plant Suite here: €890/month, flat.
Known gaps, in priority order — not hidden.
No machine data — the biggest one
Every competitor's OEE story starts at the PLC. A CSV drop folder or basic OPC-UA reader is next.
In planMSA is not competitive yet
A stored repeatability percentage, not a real operator × part × trial study with %GRR and ndc.
In planNo mobile app, no offline
Responsive web only today. Shop floors have bad wifi and people carry phones.
In planNo security certification yet
TISAX is effectively a gate for software touching OEM-adjacent data.
In planNot yet multi-tenant
Built for one company today. Needed before a second customer comes on.
In planBus factor of one, thin tests
Four test files against ~33,000 lines, one person who understands all of it.
In planLooking for a technical co-founder, and someone to own sales.
This was built by a small, effective team, with AI — faster and cheaper than any legacy competitor's process allows. Looking for a technical partner who's shipped to production and is genuinely interested in industrial software — and separately, someone to own go-to-market, since that isn't where I want to spend my time. Terms are a conversation, not a listing.